Awesome.  I noticed that you refer to the &quot;ROS Galapagos&quot; release in this file, but linked documents refer to the ROS Groovy release. Is either ok?  Do you think readers will get confused?<div><br></div><div>Steve<br>

<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Ken Conley <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:kwc@willowgarage.com">kwc@willowgarage.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Announcement and details here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.ros.org/news/2012/04/ros-fuerte-beta-1-now-available.html" target="_blank">http://www.ros.org/news/2012/04/ros-fuerte-beta-1-now-available.html</a><br>
<br>
 -- your friendly neighborhood ROS Fuerte packagers<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ros-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ros-users@code.ros.org">ros-users@code.ros.org</a><br>
<a href="https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users" target="_blank">https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Steve Cousins<br>President and CEO<br>Willow Garage, Inc<br>68 Willow Road<br>Menlo Park, CA  94025<br>650-475-2810<br><a href="mailto:cousins@willowgarage.com">cousins@willowgarage.com</a><br>


</div>