On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jonathan Bohren <jonathan.bohren@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Dirk Thomas <dthomas@willowgarage.com> wrote:(even if you can with the current catkin by passing in custom folder for build/devel/install).
Anyway we are looking for ways to make catkin_make have a bit more sugar to make that tool easier and more convenient to use.Then what if we support the following new but thin, tools for people who want to use catkin_make instead of full-on-catkin but don't like having to jump around their filesystem in the standard CMake workflow.
Note I use the current catkin_make script in `catkin init` to illustrate what that should do. Also note that this preserves what are basically pass-through calls to cmake and make`catkin init`:mkdir -p .catkin/build .catkin/install .catkin/devel
catkin_make --build .catkin/build --src . --devel .catkin/build
`catkin cmake [cmake_args]`:cd /path/to/ws/.catkin/build && cmake /path/to/ws $cmake_args`catkin make [make_args]`:cd /path/to/ws/.catkin/build && make $make_args`catkin ninja [ninja_args]`:cd /path/to/ws/.catkin/build && ninja $ninja_args
`catkin source`:source /path/to/ws/.catkin/devel/setup.sh
Also it's worth noting that the current version catkin_make ignores the "--devel" argument.
-j--Jonathan BohrenPhD StudentDynamical Systems and Control LaboratoryLaboratory for Computational Sensing and RoboticsThe Johns Hopkins University
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users