On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Edwards, Shaun M. <sedwards@swri.org> wrote:
Looks like the discussion has died down.  I agree with Adolfo's changes and will incorporate them.  Unfortunately, I didn't hear an overwhelming response that the entire ROS community would find the status reporting useful.  I had hoped to incorporate the status symbols into the broader ROS wiki, instead of the "Industrial" sub pages.  For now I will leave the status descriptions where they are and mark the ROS-Industrial specific packages appropriately.  Maybe over time we will see if others choose to use them.

+1

I don't have much to add to what many have already posted, but I think the need for better package status is pretty widespread.
--
 joq