On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess this whole conversation deserves a proper SIG no ? There seem to be a lot of interest and several things to talk about: standards, policies, reports, software. Actually, just came across an ABI / API breakage site for popular open source projects :
http://upstream-tracker.org/
Some of the ones we use in our ecosystem are there:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/assimp.html
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/opencv.html
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/pcl.html
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/yaml-cpp.html

Either that, or take it to the already-existing build system SIG:

 http://wiki.ros.org/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem
 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ros-sig-buildsystem
--
 joq