On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Paul Mathieu wrote: > >> So back to my earlier question - is setting a queue size expensive in the >> python implementation? If there isn't a technical weakness there, then I'm >> all for a) warnings and a migration point sometime in the future - it >> wouldn't be very costly to mechanically search and destroy all >> rospy.Publisher instances in a ros workspace. >> > > I agree with Daniel. Changing the default will break existing code, but if > the default is undesirable in a non-negligible amount of cases, then it > should be changed. > I would be in favor for a warning in Indigo, and a change of behavior in > J-turtle. > +1 for agreement with Daniel and Paul. For a long time I made an intuitive assumption that rospy worked similarly to roscpp. Having used rospy more lately, I now realize that was wrong. But, I still think similar behavior is desirable. -- joq