So the options I see: - Stop using Travis - can Jenkins do the same thing? Other CIs? - Release debians of ROS for Precise - very difficult/def. not worth the time - Somehow entice Travis developers (donations with money I don't have) - Build our own continuous integration servers - also difficult dave 325.261.3283 c On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dave Coleman wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has anyone > found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs > Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by > https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046 > > So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo branch. > Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e. > https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490 > > Thanks! > > dave coleman > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM, wrote: > >> Send ros-release mailing list submissions to >> ros-release@code.ros.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> ros-release-request@code.ros.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> ros-release-owner@code.ros.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700 >> From: Tully Foote >> To: The ROS release mailing list >> Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions >> ? >> Message-ID: >> > jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we have >> not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built into >> the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that. >> >> With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in >> Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but >> the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to update >> the rosdep rule. >> >> >> Link online: >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names >> >> >From saucy/amd64 Packages file: >> Package: libgphoto2-6-dev >> Priority: optional >> Section: libdevel >> Installed-Size: 11550 >> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers >> Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers < >> pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> >> Architecture: amd64 >> Source: libgphoto2 >> Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5 >> Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev >> Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev, >> libc-dev, pkg-config >> Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev >> Filename: >> pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb >> Size: 3340498 >> MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179 >> SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f >> SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019 >> Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files) >> Homepage: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/ >> Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0 >> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug >> Origin: Ubuntu >> Supported: 9m >> >> >> >> Tully >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in >> the >> > past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy ( >> > >> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/ >> > simply because for some reason, >> > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev was not released in >> > Saucy). >> > Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining 10 >> > Ubuntu distributions. >> > >> > Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once >> it's >> > out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to back >> > that up ? Docs for what to drop here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases >> > That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper). >> > >> > Thoughts ? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ros-release mailing list >> > ros-release@code.ros.org >> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-release mailing list >> ros-release@code.ros.org >> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >> >> >> End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3 >> ****************************************** >> > >