The community buildfarm does have a pull request builder plugin. Does that only work on certain orgs? Can others have it enabled? On 9 September 2014 12:57, Dave Coleman wrote: > So the options I see: > > - Stop using Travis - can Jenkins do the same thing? Other CIs? > - Release debians of ROS for Precise - very difficult/def. not worth > the time > - Somehow entice Travis developers (donations with money I don't have) > - Build our own continuous integration servers - also difficult > > > dave > 325.261.3283 c > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dave Coleman > wrote: > >> I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has anyone >> found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs >> Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by >> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046 >> >> So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo >> branch. Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e. >> https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490 >> >> Thanks! >> >> dave coleman >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM, wrote: >> >>> Send ros-release mailing list submissions to >>> ros-release@code.ros.org >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> ros-release-request@code.ros.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> ros-release-owner@code.ros.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700 >>> From: Tully Foote >>> To: The ROS release mailing list >>> Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions >>> ? >>> Message-ID: >>> >> jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we >>> have >>> not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built >>> into >>> the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that. >>> >>> With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in >>> Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but >>> the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to >>> update >>> the rosdep rule. >>> >>> >>> Link online: >>> >>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names >>> >>> >From saucy/amd64 Packages file: >>> Package: libgphoto2-6-dev >>> Priority: optional >>> Section: libdevel >>> Installed-Size: 11550 >>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers >>> Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers < >>> pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> >>> Architecture: amd64 >>> Source: libgphoto2 >>> Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5 >>> Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev >>> Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev, >>> libc-dev, pkg-config >>> Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev >>> Filename: >>> pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb >>> Size: 3340498 >>> MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179 >>> SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f >>> SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019 >>> Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files) >>> Homepage: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/ >>> Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0 >>> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug >>> Origin: Ubuntu >>> Supported: 9m >>> >>> >>> >>> Tully >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud >> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in >>> the >>> > past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy ( >>> > >>> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/ >>> > simply because for some reason, >>> > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev was not released in >>> > Saucy). >>> > Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining 10 >>> > Ubuntu distributions. >>> > >>> > Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once >>> it's >>> > out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to >>> back >>> > that up ? Docs for what to drop here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases >>> > That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper). >>> > >>> > Thoughts ? >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > ros-release mailing list >>> > ros-release@code.ros.org >>> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>> > >>> > >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: < >>> http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html >>> > >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ros-release mailing list >>> ros-release@code.ros.org >>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>> >>> >>> End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3 >>> ****************************************** >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ros-release mailing list > ros-release@code.ros.org > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release > >