Can we please keep topics like supporting communication with browsers on the ng-sig? I have already asked Hai off channel to repost over to the sig, which he has and I have since responded there too. I understand the want to discuss high level concerns about ROS 2.0 on ros-user's, which is fine, but we should really strive to keep the traffic here low (we get a lot of complaints about the traffic on this list from technical discussions and support questions). Thanks, On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Bohren wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Hai Nguyen wrote: > >> I'm not particularly familiar with DDS, but does it work nicely with >> browsers? either through some sort of translation or better yet, natively? >> I'm interested as the current ROS to WebSockets bridge is particularly >> ugly: the bridge has to subscribe to all the messages that any web client >> would need to listen to and then rebroadcast them, which introduces >> additional delays making it horribly painful to use for things like teleop >> with large messages like images or point clouds. >> > > This looks promising: > http://www.prismtech.com/blog/dds-web-programming-dscript > > -j > > -- > Jonathan Bohren > Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics > http://dscl.lcsr.jhu.edu/People/JonathanBohren > > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@lists.ros.org > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > > -- William Woodall ROS Development Team william@osrfoundation.org http://wjwwood.io/