I'd recommend removing the dependency from catkin_tools (not sure why you'd need it, but assuming you can remove it easily). I don't think it will work on Saucy and I intend to remove the deb for it or revert it to the 0.3.1 version at the very least. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Tully Foote via ros-release < ros-release@lists.ros.org> wrote: > The rebuild overnight has basically completed for all the targets except > armhf. However I see that there are a few failures related to a dependency > on the new beta catkin_tools on saucy. > > > http://build.ros.org/view/Ibin_uS64/job/Ibin_uS64__collada_urdf_jsk_patch__ubuntu_saucy_amd64__binary/8/console > > While we're still waiting for armhf to finish rebuilding we can work to > resolve this. But otherwise we'll keep holding new releases except for new > kinetic packages, since new packages are leafs and will typically build > quickly and not significantly load the farm. > > Tully > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Tully Foote > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As a quick update, we've rereleased ros_comm after triaging a few issues. >> The farms in a high intensity rebuild. We're going to hold all new releases >> to get indigo rebuilt. It's going to be a day or two >> >> Isaac, could you run the same patch release for Jade moveit? It looks >> like it's failing the same way. We'll work to triage that down once indigo >> has been rebuilt. >> >> Tully >> >> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Tully Foote >> wrote: >> >>> @Isaac, Indeed, we look like we've resolved most of the regressions. >>> There are a few trailing builds on arm which are finishing up. >>> >>> @Everyone, please take some time to test this. >>> >>> @ros/rosdistro mergers please hold new indigo releases so we can have >>> some testing time with the clean state. >>> >>> @maintainers please let us know here if there's any issues that should >>> block the sync. >>> >>> I'll plan to sync early next week unless I hear otherwise. >>> >>> Tully >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Isaac Isao Saito-Yanagisawa via >>> ros-release wrote: >>> >>>> > Looking at Indigo: >>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_default.html?q=REGRESSION >>>> >>>> For Indigo, it got much better now that moveit_* packages and >>>> dependent packages seem to have become available on shadow repo. >>>> >>>> -Isaac >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:10 PM, William Woodall >>>> wrote: >>>> > I'm waiting on someone to try a fix for building the broken packages >>>> with >>>> > `catkin_make`, which if it works I'll need to release rviz again. >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Tully Foote < >>>> tfoote@osrfoundation.org> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi Everyone, >>>> >> >>>> >> We've made good progress resolving the regressions. On Jade we only >>>> have >>>> >> one regression in moveit_ros_benchmark_gui : >>>> >> https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/issues/654 >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_jade_default.html?q=REGRESSION >>>> >> >>>> >> Looking at Indigo: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_default.html?q=REGRESSION >>>> >> >>>> >> The same moveit regression is on indigo. As well as a few packages >>>> in the >>>> >> interactive_world repository with compile errors. >>>> >> >>>> >> Tully >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:42 PM, William Woodall via ros-release >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I'm working on a fix for rviz on Saucy, and I opened an issue on >>>> >>> moveit_ros about the moveit_ros_benchmarks_gui (they will have to >>>> change >>>> >>> something because of a change in rviz). >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Isaac Isao Saito-Yanagisawa via >>>> >>> ros-release wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> moveit_ros (more specifically moveit_ros_benchmarks_gui) and some >>>> >>>> others that depend on it are also failing on both I and J. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Tully, do we not have to worry too much about these packages, maybe >>>> >>>> because looks like they were built successfully until a few days >>>> ago >>>> >>>> but suddenly started failing (they might be just hitting a >>>> temporary >>>> >>>> glitch)? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ## I noticed this because some of the CI jobs in our repos that use >>>> >>>> shadow-fixed started failing due to these packages missing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Isaac >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Mathieu Labbé >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi, >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > I looked at the rtabmap error, but I am not sure what causes the >>>> >>>> > problem >>>> >>>> > (the error happens when creating the .deb after the >>>> build/install). >>>> >>>> > Locally, >>>> >>>> > I can build the .deb correctly. If someone has some ideas, I've >>>> made >>>> >>>> > an >>>> >>>> > issue here: https://github.com/introlab/rtabmap/issues/63 >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > cheers, >>>> >>>> > Mathieu >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > 2016-03-22 20:47 GMT-04:00 Tully Foote via ros-release >>>> >>>> > : >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> We're approaching the final releases of Indigo and Jade to be >>>> built >>>> >>>> >> on >>>> >>>> >> Saucy, Utopic, and Vivid. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Right now we have a few regressions. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Indigo Regressions: >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_default.html?q=REGRESSION >>>> >>>> >> Jade Regressions: >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_jade_default.html?q=REGRESSION >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> I see what appears to be 3 distinct groups. rtabmap, naoqi, and >>>> a set >>>> >>>> >> of >>>> >>>> >> jsk packages. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Maintainers of those packages please take a look at them. If >>>> they >>>> >>>> >> regress >>>> >>>> >> this cycle it will be permanent for Saucy, Utopic, and Vivid. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Please everyone consider testing the packages in shadow fixed >>>> in the >>>> >>>> >> next >>>> >>>> >> week and a half. We plan to do the sync at the end of next week >>>> on >>>> >>>> >> Friday >>>> >>>> >> April 1st. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> If there are any important releases pending please let us know. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> Tully & William >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> >> ros-release mailing list >>>> >>>> >> ros-release@lists.ros.org >>>> >>>> >> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> > ros-release mailing list >>>> >>>> > ros-release@lists.ros.org >>>> >>>> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> ros-release mailing list >>>> >>>> ros-release@lists.ros.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> William Woodall >>>> >>> ROS Development Team >>>> >>> william@osrfoundation.org >>>> >>> http://wjwwood.io/ >>>> >>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> ros-release mailing list >>>> >>> ros-release@lists.ros.org >>>> >>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > William Woodall >>>> > ROS Development Team >>>> > william@osrfoundation.org >>>> > http://wjwwood.io/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ros-release mailing list >>>> ros-release@lists.ros.org >>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release >>>> >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ros-release mailing list > ros-release@lists.ros.org > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release > > -- William Woodall ROS Development Team william@osrfoundation.org http://wjwwood.io/