IMHO the problem is that answers.ros.org has no where near the feature set or polish of Stack Overflow (e.g. clever ways to help new users understand the system). While I understand the desire to own the data, I think it's not worth while when the data is so broken :( 

Personally, I'd love to see answers.ros.org migrate to Stack Exchange.


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Claudio Carbone <cla_carbone@tiscali.it> wrote:
Ever since I joined the ROS community I've felt Answers to be pretty unsuitable for the work.
I guess it all comes down to expectations and overview (which WG has much wider than mine).

I can't stop thinking that a forum would be a lot better though: you can have subforums tailored to the specific argument (eg: building which would cover build systems and package/stack structures; transformations which would cover urdf models, joints, publishers; Communications which would cover the ROS API, topics, services, etc...), tags  wouldn't go away as modern forums have them too, you can moderate a lot more effectively, people can cluster into the subforum they feel more at home with (maybe I'm an expert on building, or cameras), and searching would be a lot more useful as people would be naturally inclined to phrase their topic title according to the subforum argument.

It probably would be some more work to maintain, but I can see a lot more use in such a platform.

Noob question now: what does "make this page a wiki" really means?
What happens to wikied questions?

Best regards
--

Eng. Claudio Carbone
Embedded Systems Design

P.IVA: 11688471009
tel: +393809017424
email: Send email
My linkedin profile

My Portfolio
My portfolio site

 


_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users




--
:wq

Google Germany GmbH
Dienerstr. 12
80331 München

AG Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens

Tax ID:- 48/725/00206
VAT ID:- DE813741370