This is just my opinion, but I feel that QA systems like askbot and stackexchange are far superior for this type of community effort than a forum like phpbb. Case in point, I almost never find the answer to my programming or system administration problems on a forum anymore, I instead find them on *.stackexchange.com.I don't think it has to do with owning the data as much as the arduous process of getting a stackexchange instance. The http://robotics.stackexchange.com/ has been working towards getting vetted for a long time now, perhaps ROS questions/answers could live there in the future, but having a dedicated ROS stackexchange is not feasible IMHO.
--
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Claudio Carbone <cla_carbone@tiscali.it> wrote:
I just remembered that the phpbb.org support forum (phpbb being one of the widest spread free forum platforms) even has sub-sub-<...>-forums for each and every plugin/modification where the creator of the plugin/mod can answer users questions far from the main busy discussion areas keeping them clean.On 20/02/13 10:24, Claudio Carbone wrote:
you can have subforums tailored to the specific argument (eg: building which would cover build systems and package/stack structures; transformations which would cover urdf models, joints, publishers; Communications which would cover the ROS API, topics, services, etc...)
I can't but think this would be much more useful to the community.
Although I acknowledge that it's ultimately a management decision from WG or whoever will guide ROS in the future.
Best regards
--
Eng. Claudio Carbone
Embedded Systems Design
P.IVA: 11688471009
tel: +393809017424
email: Send email
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
--
William WoodallWillow Garage - Software Engineer
_______________________________________________ ros-users mailing list ros-users@code.ros.org https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users