I recommend taking discussion of the rep to the comments/issues section of the github repository.
From: ros-users [mailto:ros-users-bounces@lists.ros.org]
On Behalf Of Austin Hendrix
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 4:43 PM
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] REP 144 - ROS Package Naming
Wonderful! It’s nice to see more formal standards for naming conventions.
Two comments:
It would be nice to give a few examples for the prefix rules.
Are there any rules for robot-specific configurations for other packages; for example navigation and moveit?
-Austin
On Mar 1, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
after not knowing how to properly name packages for NAO, I wrote a REP for how to name ROS packages:
https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/blob/master/rep-0144.rst
The original discussion with awesome reviewers happened at:
https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/pull/94
The draft is now in the process of becoming official (or rejected) so if you have any feedback, please continue the discussion here:
https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/pull/96
Thx,
Vincent
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
------------------------------------------------------
This is an e-mail from General Dynamics Robotic Systems. It is for the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in reliance on it or its attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this message to the sender and delete the message and any attachments from your computer. Your cooperation is appreciated.