Re: [ros-users] Making message transport more modular?

Joining the RosNG SIG would make sense to me.
I'll add the topic there then.

Thanks for the feedback so far.

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Karan, Cem F CIV (US)
<cem.f.karan.civ@mail.mil> wrote:
> Should we join the RosNG SIG, or is there a different one planned for this?
>
> Thanks,
> Cem Karan
>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 5
>>Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:56:57 -0500
>>From: "Jack O'Quin" <jack.oquin@gmail.com>
>>To: User discussions <ros-users@code.ros.org>
>>Subject: Re: [ros-users] Making message transport more modular?
>>Message-ID:
>>       <CAB6SgyUzZE+vNAvkDVmCawOGMJVOvzMXDUJAbtwNDYW3pCmx2A@mail.gmail.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>>On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Damon Kohler <damonkohler@google.com>
>>wrote:
>>> FYI, this is something people were discussing at ROSCon and will
>>> probably be covered as part of the nextgen ROS SIG:
>>>
>>> http://www.ros.org/wiki/groovy/Planning/RosNG
>>
>>I agree with Damon that the networking discussions should be held
>>jointly, even if the eventual solutions end up being orthogonal.
>>--
>>?joq
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users



--
Cedric Pradalier