Re: [ros-release] Kinetic release update

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jon Binney
Date:  
To: Jackie Kay, The ROS release mailing list
Subject: Re: [ros-release] Kinetic release update
I can do laser_pipeline. It depends on laser_assembler, which also doesn't
appear to be released but doesn't show up here - why is that?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Jackie Kay via ros-release <
> wrote:

> *tl;dr*: April 25th is the deadline for desktop-full. Fix your failing
> jobs on the farm or ask us to disable them. Check your repo's status on
> http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases/blocked_releases_kinetic.html
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html>
>
> *Release Deadline*
> Today's update is brought to you by the metapackage "desktop-full".
>
> desktop-full consists of the metapackages "desktop", "perception", and
> "simulators".
>
> After desktop-full is released into Kinetic, we can consider ourselves in
> beta for Kinetic.
>
> I would like to establish a deadline of April 25th for releasing
> desktop-full.
>
> Here are the remaining packages that need to be released:
>
> control_msgs
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.control_msgs>
> executive_smach
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.executive_smach>
> gazebo_ros_pkgs
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.gazebo_ros_pkgs>
> image_transport_plugins
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.image_transport_plugins>
> laser_pipeline
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.laser_pipeline>
> perception_pcl
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.perception_pcl>
> robot_state_publisher
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.robot_state_publisher>
> rqt_common_plugins
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.rqt_common_plugins>
> rqt_robot_plugins
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.rqt_robot_plugins>
> stage_ros
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.stage_ros>
> urdf_tutorial
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.urdf_tutorial>
> visualization_tutorials
> <http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases_kinetic.html?q=.visualization_tutorials>
>
> Maintainers of these packages (this includes me), let's get moving. If we
> released 1 package per day, we would beat the deadline. It's important to
> release early so that we can catch packaging errors on the farm.
>
> *armhf, arm64, and Debian Jessie*
> There are a lot of failing binary jobs on the farm right now. I believe
> all of the failures are currently on armhf/arm64 platforms, Debian Jessie,
> or both.
>
> To the maintainers of packages with failing jobs (this also includes me):
>
> If your failing job is due to architectural differences on ARM, please
> either address the problem or ask us to disable the armhf/arm64 build for
> your repo.
>
> If your failing job is due to missing package dependencies in Jessie,
> please look into adding the correct rosdep keys or adding a backport for
> missing dependencies. We do not have a way to blacklist packages in Debian
> only, but luckily these issues are usually easier to identify and fix than
> architecture differences.
>
> And if at some point your package fails on all architectures and you don't
> make efforts to fix it, I will blacklist it entirely because those emails
> are really annoying to receive.
>
>
> *Blocked Repos Webpage*
> An intern at OSRF is working on a web interface for the
> check_blocking_repos.py script announced on this list a few weeks ago.
>
> You can test it here:
>
> http://54.183.65.232/status_page/blocked_releases/blocked_releases_kinetic.html
>
> I encourage you to use it to figure out which packages are blocking your
> package (or if you are blocking someone else's packages).
>
> It's still in review and has a few minor improvements pending. If you find
> issues with it, you can report them on
> https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/ros_buildfarm
>
> Your ROS boss,
>
> Jackie
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-release mailing list
>
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>
>

_______________________________________________
ros-release mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release