[quote="gbiggs, post:3, topic:6469, full:true"]
Will the approach proposed here allow for using something like fluentd as an output? For complex robots, a tool like fluentd provides useful facilities for managing, viewing and processing logged information.
[/quote]
Yes, the proposed approach should be able to support fluentd. From what I can see, the easiest way to hook fluentd into this proposal would be to use a `tail` input to get the log events sent to to the log files. If more advanced features are needed you could always recompile the nodes and swap out the shared logger library with something that hooks directly into fluentd.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros2-logging/6469/4) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)