[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [Next Generation ROS] ROS 2 …

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Paul Bovbel via ros-users
Date:  
To: ros-users
CC: Paul Bovbel
Subject: [ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [Next Generation ROS] ROS 2 Collaboration Bulletin Board


So, having not undertaken any ROS2 porting myself, I have to ask - what's the common (dare I say standard?) practice for repos/branches? Keep the same repo, and create a `ros2` branch? I know that upstream ROS2 repositories tend to follow the `master` + distro branches approach.

Github being what it is, having two essentially 'main' branches (one for ROS1, one for ROS2) is suboptimal in terms of visibility and code search, however creating `ros2_*` repos feels unpleasant as well.





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-2-collaboration-bulletin-board/2239/58) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>