Thank you for the explanation.
Using `importlib` or to implement the code to test inside a Python module is indeed possible.
However, I still prefer the `_launch.py` suffix, since this would conform to pep naming and enable unit tests without creating additional Python modules.
I would also be interested to hear from users that moving from ROS1 to ROS2 if the `_launch.py` syntax feels unnatural compared to `.launch.py` or the other way around.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/questioning-the-launch-py-file-extension/6352/5) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)