Hello everyone,
Your friendly ros_control maintainer team has been busy thinking about what sort of community interest is there for a ROS2 ros_control version.
Example:
1. "We only need the `diff_drive_controller` as-is.
2. "My company only needs the `joint_trajectory_controller` as-is.
3. "I need all the controllers."
4. "We need a more extendable framework (flexible hardware_interfaces) while maintaining the realtime-safe qualities."
5. "My research needs interconnected controllers, the output of one is the input of the other."
6. "My robot needs different update rates per controller."
7. "My kids need better tutorials on how to write the hardware abstraction layer (RobotHW)."
8. "Redesign and rewrite the whole thing in X."
Please fire away, this is an interactive wishlist ;)
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-control-in-ros2-wishlist/7803/1) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)