[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] GSoC and the fate …

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Daniel Hammer via Discourse.ros.org via ros-users
Date:  
To: ros-users
CC: Daniel Hammer via Discourse.ros.org
Subject: [ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] GSoC and the fate of OpenEmbedded


Thanks @vmayoral . I have already experimented with meta layers from jumpnowtek and meta-ros(to generate a beaglebone and raspberry image with ROS). I find it kind of weird that its still on indigo.
Also was there any work done on integrating rmw-microxrcedds from @BorjaOuterelo? Putting ROS on microcontrollers and sbcs should kinda be the point of OpenEmbedded.
Also why is the meta-ros2 GPL3 licensed? Isn't the point of ROS2 that companies can use it, modify the layer if they want to and ship their product close sourced?





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/gsoc-and-the-fate-of-openembedded/8149/3) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>