[quote="vmayoral, post:4, topic:8149"]
Maintainers simply may not have enough time to contribute. Most of them work full-time for projects. Updating this is probably a fantastic way to demonstrate your experience with OpenEmbedded :wink: (it always helps for the application, it did in my case!)
[/quote]
Understandable, I will try to set up a nice workflow and try to fix the issues on meta-ros first.
[quote="vmayoral, post:4, topic:8149"]
Thats wrong. The point of OpenEmbedded isnt that one. Moreover this was attempted in the past and youd find that getting a fully fledged DDS implementation running in a microcontroller is somewhat complicated and not really useful. Thats what the micro-ROS project is for which builds on top of previous experiences.
[/quote]
Can you elaborate why it wouldn't be useful? Offloading intensive, high frequency calculations to a microcontroller(f.e. sensor data processing) then sending back the results sounds pretty useful. Or did I misunderstand something?
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/gsoc-and-the-fate-of-openembedded/8149/5) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)