[ros-release] Most of previous pre-release tests have failed

[Tully Foote]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Isaac Isao Saito <130s at lateeye.net> wrote:

> Now I also see some pre-releases pass w/o failures. Thanks Tully!
>
> Let me ask one follow-up question regarding what Jack said;
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I like to run the "devel" pre-release on the source repo before using
> bloom-release.
>
> Is there a ways to run the pre-release test on ROS' jenkins against
> source repo (I know local pre-release is possible as in the wiki#1)?
>
> #1 http://wiki.ros.org/bloom/Tutorials/PrereleaseTest#Locally
>
>
That's what a devel prerelease is.  The devel test is against the source as
defined in source.yaml using key matching against release.yaml. The latest
and version numbered prereleases go against the release repo tags.

Tully


> Thanks,
> Isaac
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> With the change in servers recently I've just identified an issue with
> >> different memory usages between servers that is causing complete
> failures.
> >
> >
> > We updated the scripts and the prerelease jobs no longer run out of
> memory.
> > I've tested a few of the recent failures now pass:
> >
> http://jenkins.ros.org/job/prerelease_groovy_erratic_robot_precise_amd64/
> >
> > Tully
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Isaac Isao Saito <130s at lateeye.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Happy Friday ROS-Release,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm afraid I've not yet gotten the idea of ROS pre-release. One thing
> >>>> is, what does the failure of the majority of previous prerelease tests
> >>>> mean?
> >>>> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/Prerelease/
> >>>> Do maintainers fix on their upstrem repositories after getting
> >>>> pre-release error, and release w/o pre-release?
> >>
> >>
> >> Unfortunately at the moment we don't have completely clean prereleases
> so
> >> most things will cause failures.  Part of that is we don't have a clear
> line
> >> for how to scope prereleases so they build everything downstream.  The
> >> important thing to do is look through the errors and confirm that your
> >> release does not create new ones.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Not sure what others do. I like to run the "devel" pre-release on the
> >>> source repo before using bloom-release. I usually skip the "latest"
> option,
> >>> which uses the release repo, instead.
> >>>
> >>> I would be interested to know what different tests those options
> actually
> >>> perform.
> >>
> >>
> >> They do the same thing, except that they have a different source of the
> >> code.
> >>
> >> Tully
> >>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>  joq
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ros-release mailing list
> >>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
> >>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
> >>>
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ros-release mailing list
> ros-release at lists.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20130930/cbf1a567/attachment.html>