[ros-release] Pending sync for Indigo

[Tully Foote]

Hi Dejan,

I know that people have tested it and demonstrated it running on armhf, but
I don't know that we've ever had debs for it.

It's one of the first things we blacklisted once we had the ability to
blacklist:
https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/ros_buildfarm_config/commit/889b986df40f0c7d6054cfdca5ffa0c4171aed46

It's been too long to have any build history:
http://build.ros.org:8080/job/Ibin_arm_uThf__gazebo_ros__ubuntu_trusty_armhf__binary/

We only have gazebo5 debs in armhf for Trusty:
http://repos.ros.org/repos/ros_bootstrap/dists/trusty/main/binary-armhf/Packages
Versus gazebo2 and gazebo5 for amd64:
http://repos.ros.org/repos/ros_bootstrap/dists/trusty/main/binary-amd64/Packages

And even that isn't being built on jade.

Tully


On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Dejan Pangercic <dejan.pangercic at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Tully,
> has it always been so that ros-indigo-gazebo-ros-* pkgs have not been
> released for armhf:
> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_arm.html?
> I somehow remember that I used to be able to install them on my Odroid...
> D.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:10 AM Tully Foote via ros-release <
> ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone, As you may have seen(
>> http://discourse.ros.org/t/new-packages-for-indigo/291) Indigo packages
>> have been synced. As such the release hold is off.
>>
>> We also took the quiet moment on the buildfarm to do a few upgrades to
>> the release files for more granular blacklisting support.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tully
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, @rosdistro maintainers please hold new releases. We'll wait for the
>>> buildfarm to catch up and then sync.
>>>
>>> Tully
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Indigo Maintainers,
>>>>
>>>> I'm planning to sync shortly for Indigo. We completed a rebuild over
>>>> the weekend. With one regression of fetcheus generally and on Saucy
>>>> jsk_pcl_ros_utils fails due to missing python-texttable but since Saucy is
>>>> EOL I don't plan to block the release for that.
>>>>
>>>> Please take some time to test from shadow-fixed and let me know if you
>>>> have any feedback. Without any feedback I expect to sync later this week.
>>>>
>>>> Tully
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-release mailing list
>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20160624/657aba68/attachment.html>