<div dir="ltr">Might be another argument for someone to try building up a unofficial farm of Precise/Indigo debs. Do we have a sense how many of the 1000 or so released Indigo packages have an <i>actual</i> problem with the CMake/Boost versions which ship with Precise?<div><br></div><div>How ugly of a hack would it be to use the Saucy bloom branches to build Precise debs? How much time would it take to find out?</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 September 2014 17:46, William Woodall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:william@osrfoundation.org" target="_blank">william@osrfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Coleman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:davetcoleman@gmail.com" target="_blank">davetcoleman@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(38,38,38);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px">I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has </span><span style="color:rgb(38,38,38);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px">anyone found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by<br></span><div><font color="#262626" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px"><a href="https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046" target="_blank">https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046</a></span></font></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Nope, I just use hydro for now. There really isn't a good option if you want to use travis until travis supports Trusty. You could build what you need from source, but that probably would take too long.<br></div><div><div class="h5"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="color:rgb(38,38,38);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(38,38,38);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px">So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo branch. Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e.</span></div><div><font color="#262626" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px"><a href="https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490" target="_blank">https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490</a></span><br></font><div><font color="#262626" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#262626" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px">Thanks!<br></span></font><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font>dave coleman</font></span></div><div><br></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM,  <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ros-release-request@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release-request@code.ros.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Send ros-release mailing list submissions to<br>
        <a href="mailto:ros-release@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release@code.ros.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
        <a href="http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release" target="_blank">http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
        <a href="mailto:ros-release-request@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release-request@code.ros.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
        <a href="mailto:ros-release-owner@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release-owner@code.ros.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
   1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700<br>
From: Tully Foote <<a href="mailto:tfoote@osrfoundation.org" target="_blank">tfoote@osrfoundation.org</a>><br>
To: The ROS release mailing list <<a href="mailto:ros-release@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release@code.ros.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions<br>
        ?<br>
Message-ID:<br>
        <CAM7qi7U9NcH6-drP82rPTU=Rp8C=<a href="mailto:jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we have<br>
not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built into<br>
the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that.<br>
<br>
With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in<br>
Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but<br>
the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to update<br>
the rosdep rule.<br>
<br>
<br>
Link online:<br>
<a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names" target="_blank">http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names</a><br>
<br>
>From saucy/amd64 Packages file:<br>
Package: libgphoto2-6-dev<br>
Priority: optional<br>
Section: libdevel<br>
Installed-Size: 11550<br>
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <<a href="mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>
Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <<br>
<a href="mailto:pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org" target="_blank">pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org</a>><br>
Architecture: amd64<br>
Source: libgphoto2<br>
Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5<br>
Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev<br>
Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev,<br>
libc-dev, pkg-config<br>
Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev<br>
Filename:<br>
pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb<br>
Size: 3340498<br>
MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179<br>
SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f<br>
SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019<br>
Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files)<br>
Homepage: <a href="http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/" target="_blank">http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/</a><br>
Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0<br>
Bugs: <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug</a><br>
Origin: Ubuntu<br>
Supported: 9m<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Tully<br>
<br>
<br>
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud <<a href="mailto:vincent.rabaud@gmail.com" target="_blank">vincent.rabaud@gmail.com</a>><br>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in the<br>
> past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy (<br>
> <a href="http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/" target="_blank">http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/</a><br>
> simply because for some reason,<br>
> <a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev" target="_blank">http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev</a> was not released in<br>
> Saucy).<br>
> Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining 10<br>
> Ubuntu distributions.<br>
><br>
> Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once it's<br>
> out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to back<br>
> that up ? Docs for what to drop here: <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases</a><br>
> That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper).<br>
><br>
> Thoughts ?<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> ros-release mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:ros-release@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release@code.ros.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release" target="_blank">http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release</a><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ros-release mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ros-release@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release@code.ros.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release" target="_blank">http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3<br>
******************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
ros-release mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ros-release@code.ros.org" target="_blank">ros-release@code.ros.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release" target="_blank">http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">William Woodall<div>ROS Development Team</div><div><a href="mailto:william@osrfoundation.org" target="_blank">william@osrfoundation.org</a></div><div><a href="http://wjwwood.io/" target="_blank">http://wjwwood.io/</a></div></div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
ros-release mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ros-release@code.ros.org">ros-release@code.ros.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release" target="_blank">http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>