[ros-users] failure building camera_drivers/trunk/camera1394 with latest release (updated today)

Jack O'Quin jack.oquin at gmail.com
Fri May 14 04:22:37 UTC 2010

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Blaise Gassend
<blaise at willowgarage.com> wrote:
> The main reason is, as you guessed in your email, that the levels
> have no meaning at all at the dynamic_reconfigure level. The only
> place that gives them meaning is the state machine in driver_base.
> It felt unclean to me to have them in dynamic_reconfigure for that reason.
> Also, driver_base is very light weight (no libraries), and is in the
> same stack as dynamic_reconfigure. Therefore, depending on driver_base
> is essentially free for a package that already depends on
> dynamic_reconfigure.
> Does that sound reasonable?


My main problem was having used example code rather than documentation
to figure out dynamic_reconfigure in the first place.

More information about the ros-users mailing list