[ros-users] common stack dependencies on pr2.

[Konrad Banachowicz]

I overlooked version information of this stack.
I think it's should be more visible on wiki.

Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz


2010/10/23 Ken Conley <kwc at willowgarage.com>

> Hi Konrad,
>
> While I'm sure the developers of the motion_planners stack will take
> steps to remove PR2 dependencies, I thought I should point to our
> stack version policy, which may clarify things:
>
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/StackVersionPolicy
>
> motion_planners is 0.2.4, which is described as
> "research/experimental... some review has occurred, and we are
> migrating this stack to more stable APIs". It will not be stabilized
> for Diamondback, but you may be interested in this ticket about
> trajectory_msgs:
>
> https://code.ros.org/trac/wg-ros-pkg/ticket/4675
>
> Also, motion_planners is distributed in the 'pr2all' variant of ROS
> which is described as "ROS plus PR2 and bleeding edge
> research/experimental stacks." Only stacks in the stable 'base'
> variant are expected to be robot generic.
>
>  - Ken
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I currently run robots in our lab on ROS.
> > With mobile everything goes fine, but when i started with manipulators.
> > I found that in ROS is some strange dependencies, in manipulation stacks
> is
> > many dependencies on PR2 specyfic packages. For example
> > pr2_controllers_msgs/JointTrajectoryActionGoal is used by many of the
> common
> > stacks. trajectory_msgs is also part of one of PR2 stacks. This kind of
> > dependencies should be strictly forbiden.
> > There are some PR2 specyfic packages residing in common stacks, the best
> > example i think is interpolated_ik_motion_planner which reside in
> > motion_planners stack. And documentation do not mention about PR2
> specyfic
> > of this package.
> > Pozdrawiam
> > Konrad Banachowicz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-users mailing list
> > ros-users at code.ros.org
> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20101023/57d2731f/attachment-0004.html>