[ros-users] Content of deb packages.

[Adam Leeper]

I disagree on removing sources... they are useful for reference (if you
can't get online) even if you aren't doing development on a package.


Adam Leeper
Stanford University
aleeper at stanford.edu
719.358.3804


On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com>wrote:

> I would go further and say that sources should be removed from debs.
> debs are not intended to be build by hand. If i want to do some devel on
> package, I will checkout code form svn.
>
> Pozdrawiam
> Konrad Banachowicz
>
>
> 2010/10/31 Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com>
>
> But depending on a file which should not exist is not a bug ?
>>
>> Pozdrawiam
>> Konrad Banachowicz
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/31 Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this could
>>> reveal
>>> > existings ones.
>>>
>>> If something worked before, then starts failing because a file it
>>> depended on was purged from the package, that seems like a "new bug"
>>> to me.
>>> --
>>>  joq
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-users mailing list
>>> ros-users at code.ros.org
>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20101031/c47c8a57/attachment-0003.html>