No subject

l existings ones.<div><br clear=3D"all">Pozdrawiam<br>Konrad Banachowicz<br=
>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2010/10/31 Jeremy Leibs <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:leibs at willowgarage.com">leibs at willowgarage.com</a>&=
gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Konrad B=
anachowicz &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:konradb3 at gmail.com">konradb3 at gmail.com</a>=
&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt; I have some concerns about content of ROS deb packages.<br>
&gt; Every deb contains build dir, which is actually more than half of size=
 of<br>
&gt; package.<br>
&gt; I some packeges use more than 1.5GB of disk space.<br>
&gt; As far as i know content of build dirrectory is useless because it con=
tain<br>
&gt; paths used to build deb.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Yes, we have been aware of this fact for a while and trying to =
remedy<br>
the situation. =C2=A0Unfortunately some of the ROS packages were previously=
<br>
linking against some of the libraries only stored in the build<br>
directory, and so removing them broke things. =C2=A0We opted to leave them<=
br>
in since the only impact was on filesize. =C2=A0The build system is now<br>
purging them in the &quot;unstable&quot; line of debs, so they should defin=
itely<br>
be gone from &quot;diamondback&quot; when it comes out. =C2=A0I don&#39;t k=
now if we are<br>
planning to make a comparable change for cturtle since we don&#39;t want<br=
>
to introduce new bugs into our stable line of debs in the event that<br>
we don&#39;t catch a corner case.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ros-users mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:ros-users at code.ros.org">ros-users at code.ros.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users" target=3D"_blan=
k">https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--20cf303ea29a3676630493ed8db1--