[ros-users] ROS cturtle on openSuSE 11.2

Willy Lambert lambert.willy at gmail.com
Sun Aug 28 13:14:00 UTC 2011


2011/8/28 V C <vcravi at gmail.com>

> Hi.
>
> First off, a big thanks to the community that has created and is
> maintaining ROS ! You are doing a great job !
>
> I am trying to get cturtle working on openSuSE 11.2. Per the instructions
> on the wiki and earlier discussions on the mailing list, I understand that
> support for openSuSE is a work in progress, and I would like to add my
> experience and perhaps contribute a little here.
>
> 1. rosinstall: I am doing a "Base install"; we are behind an authenticating
> proxy here, and while SVN was able to check out the necessary packages with
> the addition of the necessary config variables in .subversion, the default
> Mercurial on openSuSE 11.2 (1.3.1) was unable to handle the https check out;
> I worked around it by manually installing the latest Mercurial release,
> which was able to handle it correctly.
>
> 2. OS detection: cturtle by itself does not detect the OS; however by
> looking at the latest builds where detection of openSuSE is supported, I
> managed to include the necessary code in rosdep/{opensuse.py, core.py} and
> rosbuild/os_detect.py to detect the OS. One doubt I had here was why the
> lsb_* functions were not being used to detect the OS - on modifying the code
> to use the lsb_* functions, I find that the OS and version are being
> detected correctly. Am I missing something here ?
>
> 3. rosdep.yaml: I updated all the rosdep.yaml files to autoinstall
> dependencies from RPMs as far as I could detect them. However, a few
> dependencies require manual installs (wget <source>; configure-make-make
> install). These scripts are however not being run with rosdep saying "rosdep
> check could not check scripts"; I understood from my searches that script
> installs were not supported under cturtle, but that they are now.
> Unfortunately, never having used python myself, I am unable to back port the
> the necessary changes as easily as I could for the OS detection; I will work
> on it, but I just wanted to understand whether it is feasible and should be
> attempted. Also, how would su privileges be handled if the build is started
> as an unprivileged user ? In one case - the cg toolkit - a symbolic link
> seems required, since the cg toolkit looks for *.so, but the Mesa library
> installs it as *.so.1; how would this be handled in the rosdep.yaml ? Would
> the following work, for eg. (mixing an RPM install and a script)
>
> nvidia-cg:
>   ubuntu: nvidia-cg-toolkit
>   debian: nvidia-cg-toolkit
>   fedora: Cg
>   arch: |
>     if ! pacman -Q nvidia-cg-toolkit ; then yaourt -S nvidia-cg-toolkit; fi
>   gentoo: nvidia-cg-toolkit
>   debian: nvidia-cg-toolkit
>   opensuse:
>     11.2: Mesa cg cg-devel |
>       sudo ln -sf libGLU.so.1 /usr/lib/libGLU.so
>
> 4. OGRE, SWIG, etc: Trying a "rosmake rviz" caused the build to hang on
> OGRE and SWIG; on terminating the build with a Ctrl+C and checking the
> output, it seems that the OGRE and SWIG sources were being downloaded from
> WG by a script "download_checkmd5.py". The script correctly detected the
> authenticating proxy and was apparently waiting for user input for the
> username and password, however the prompt never appeared on the command line
> until the Ctrl+C was received. I manually downloaded the sources and put
> them in the necessary directories and moved on; however I would like to
> understand why the prompt never appeared and if possible add support for
> that. Could somebody point me in the right direction ?
>
> I am writing up a detailed note on the installation steps that I followed;
> would it be ok to post it on the list or is there a preferred alternative ?
> Also, what can I do to make it easier for anybody else to incorporate the
> changes I have made to get it working with the checked-out cturtle code ? Is
> there a separate branch being maintained for cturtle to which patches can be
> added ? I apologize if some of the questions seem very basic, but I am
> fairly new to the concept of contributing to open source code, hence the
> desire to try to "do the right thing" !
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
Hi,

is there any reason with you are not using diamondback ? (do you know that
the next version electric is coming ?)


> VC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20110828/6b85185f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the ros-users mailing list