[ros-users] Furte debbuild status?

[Tully Foote]

Hi Russell,

Generally for most releases I'd expect them to get into the testing repo
within a day or two.  We usually push to the public repo every few weeks
unless there's a critical bug. The farm's turning over right now.  We don't
push to public every cycle to save users the significant re-downloads and
let new releases have time to be tested internally and on the build farm.

Specifically, I'd expect to see rosbridge 0.2 in the public repo by the end
of the day, and if everything turns green it will sync to public with the
patched version of vision_opencv verified within the next day or two.

Tully

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Toris, Russell Charles <rctoris at wpi.edu>wrote:

> Hi Tully-
>
> Thanks for the clarification on the switch to the new build farm. I have
> another question at this point :)
>
> I see the jobs for the Fuerte packages on Jenkins, but some of them have
> not run in almost two weeks now. Furthermore, none of the new builds have
> come up with an 'apt-get update'. I've noticed that for almost 2 weeks I
> have not received any new ROS package updates on any of our systems here
> when doing apt-get updates. I know at the very least several packages that
> I released with new versions last week should have come through by now
> (e.g., ros-fuerte-rosbridge-suite is sitting at 0.1.0 but 0.2.0 was
> released several days ago:
> https://code.ros.org/svn/release/download/stacks/rosbridge_suite/rosbridge_suite-0.2.0/).
> With the new build farm, how often should new builds be released and pushed
> to the repositories?
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> Russell
>
> --
> Russell Toris
> Graduate Student | WPI Department of Computer Science
> rctoris at wpi.edu | http://users.wpi.edu/~rctoris/
>
> ________________________________
> From: ros-users-bounces at code.ros.org [ros-users-bounces at code.ros.org] on
> behalf of Tully Foote [tfoote at willowgarage.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 5:37 PM
> To: User discussions
> Subject: Re: [ros-users] Furte debbuild status?
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> The fuerte debbuilds are still running.   We switched them to the new
> build farm, which is why the old jobs were disabled.  With the update the
> html display was no longer loading the correct info.  You'll find the new
> jobs at: http://jenkins.willowgarage.com:8080/
>
> Sorry when I updated the status page for groovy I deleted the old fuerte
> but didn't add the new one.  There's a simple text based status posted now
> at http://www.ros.org/debbuild/fuerte_testing.txt  There's also statuses
> for the building and public repos in the listing at:
> http://www.ros.org/debbuild/
>
> Tully
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Toris, Russell Charles <rctoris at wpi.edu
> <mailto:rctoris at wpi.edu>> wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> What's the current status of the deb build for Fuerte? I've noticed the
> debbuild-build-debs-fuerte-* build projects on hudson have been disabled
> for several days and now http://www.ros.org/debbuild/fuerte.html is even
> missing. I know some things were causing a lot of the builds to fail the
> past week or so, but was finally able to get all of my packages to build on
> the pre-release test build. Are new builds for Fuerte coming soon?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Russell
>
> --
> Russell Toris
> Graduate Student | WPI Department of Computer Science
> rctoris at wpi.edu<mailto:rctoris at wpi.edu> | http://users.wpi.edu/~rctoris/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org<mailto:ros-users at code.ros.org>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
>
> --
> Tully Foote
> tfoote at willowgarage.com<mailto:tfoote at willowgarage.com>
> (650) 475-2827
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>



-- 
Tully Foote
tfoote at willowgarage.com
(650) 475-2827
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20120924/23149bf0/attachment-0004.html>