[ros-users] Gazebo API changed after Groovy release
Nate Koenig
natekoenig at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 16:12:36 UTC 2013
Hi Jack,
Yes, Gazebo 1.3 should have waited until Hydro. It will be more damaging to
revert Groovy back to Gazebo 1.2, so we will keep Gazebo 1.3 in Groovy.
-nate
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Nate Koenig <natekoenig at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> You are right, we broke API compatibility between Gazebo 1.2 and Gazebo
>> 1.3 without a proper tick-tock. Version 1.2 of Gazebo marked when Gazebo
>> first started to adopt the tick-tock model, and we obviously missed a
>> function. We have since improved our efforts, and there is a person looking
>> into maintaining API and ABI compatibility within Gazebo.
>>
>> Thank you for your report and concern. We'll do our best to prevent
>> future occurrences.
>>
>
> Thanks, Nate. I appreciate all the hard work you and the Gazebo developers
> are doing. It's really improving rapidly.
>
> It's good you are starting tick-tock now. That will help a lot.
>
> But, the bigger issue is that 1.3 should not have been added to ROS after
> Groovy final. It needed to wait until Hydro (which is not very long).
>
> Regards,
> --
> joq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20130201/83a9d1ea/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the ros-users
mailing list