[ros-users] What is LGPL licensed in roscpp_core metapackage?
Thibault Kruse
kruset at in.tum.de
Fri Feb 8 14:01:33 UTC 2013
On 08.02.2013 14:46, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Or is this simply a glitch in the package.xml and the line with LGPL should be removed?
It is a glitch., though harmless:
The licenses in the metapackage package.xml
only affect the files inside the metapackage folder itself, so really
only that package.xml itself.
Packages are not "part of" a metapackage, they are merely
"referenced by" zero to many metapackages.
More information about the ros-users
mailing list