[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] ROS GNU GPL v1.2 issue

S Riluvan ros.discourse at gmail.com
Wed Apr 19 15:30:05 UTC 2017

Gerkey - Thanks for replying. Extremely Sorry for my late response.

You are right on the LGPL on the header. For some reasons the blackduck tool (license scanning tool) classified this as GPL. 

However, our legal team questions use of LGPL for production use. What is the guideline ROS provides for example use of xmlrpcpp included in the ROS core for production deployment? 

Additionally, we noticed that stage and ivcon components are classified as GPL. These are part of ROS desktop. Will these be used more of a utility? 

Appreciate your feedback.


[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-gnu-gpl-v1-2-issue/1642/3) or reply to this email to respond.

More information about the ros-users mailing list