[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [Quality Assurance] On (git) branching strategies

Simon Schmeisser (isys vision) ros.discourse at gmail.com
Wed May 16 12:03:12 UTC 2018

I agree with @de-vri-es, I was quite confused at the beginning about using/contributing to a hydro-devel when the current version is kinetic. After some time you realize that the branch name basically encodes the level of backwards compatibility. But my first reaction was to think this is orphaned/stale code.
But I think this is mainly a communication issue, not a work flow or organizational one.

[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/on-git-branching-strategies/4785/4) or reply to this email to respond.

More information about the ros-users mailing list