<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Vincent Rabaud <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vincent.rabaud@gmail.com" target="_blank">vincent.rabaud@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>I guess this whole conversation deserves a proper SIG no ? There seem to be a lot of interest and several things to talk about: standards, policies, reports, software. Actually, just came across an ABI / API breakage site for popular open source projects :<br>



<a href="http://upstream-tracker.org/" target="_blank">http://upstream-tracker.org/</a><br></div>Some of the ones we use in our ecosystem are there:<br><a href="http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/assimp.html" target="_blank">http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/assimp.html</a><br>


<a href="http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/opencv.html" target="_blank">http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/opencv.html</a><br>
<a href="http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/pcl.html" target="_blank">http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/pcl.html</a><br><a href="http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/yaml-cpp.html" target="_blank">http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/yaml-cpp.html</a></div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Either that, or take it to the already-existing build system SIG:</div><div><br></div><div> <a href="http://wiki.ros.org/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem">http://wiki.ros.org/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem</a></div>
<div> <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ros-sig-buildsystem">https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ros-sig-buildsystem</a></div></div>-- <br> joq
</div></div>