[ros-release] Most of previous pre-release tests have failed

[Jack O'Quin]

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Stonier <d.stonier at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>        o This is probably the cause of the confusion we've had trying to
>>> work out what pre-releases are actually building.
>>>   * Why do some have a version key and some don't? How is it
>>> automatically added?
>>>
>>
>> Nothing happens automatically for that.
>> Whatever a maintainer puts into that file will be used: a branch name, a
>> tag name or nothing which implies the default branch.
>>
>>
> Ok, crystal now. I was wondering if source.yaml shouldn't be touched (I
> can't remember doing any pull requests to source.yaml, just to
> release.yaml, so something must be auto-generating the initial footprint
> there).
>

Daniel: I think not.

If you didn't add source.yaml entries, they are probably missing. I see no
"roscon" source.yaml entries for either Groovy or Hydro.

That means the "devel" pre-release option will not be available for those
packages.
 --
 joq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20131002/76c4dc57/attachment.html>