[ros-release] Releasing with dependency package missing on one distro
Asmodehn Shade
asmodehn at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 10:58:25 UTC 2015
So jenkins is complaining about saucy as expected :
http://jenkins.ros.org/job/ros-indigo-flask-ext-catkin_sourcedeb/8/console
But can i assume the trusty version has been released properly ?
On Jun 11, 2015 9:56 AM, "Asmodehn Shade" <asmodehn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback...
> I tried that :
>
> ==> git-bloom-generate -y rosdebian --prefix release/indigo --distros
> trusty indigo -i 2
> usage: git-bloom-generate rosdebian [-h] [-i DEBIAN_INC] -p PREFIX [-a]
> [--distros DISTROS [DISTROS ...]]
> [--install-prefix INSTALL_PREFIX]
> [--os-name OS_NAME] [-d] [--version]
> [--unsafe]
> rosdistro
> git-bloom-generate rosdebian: error: too few arguments
> <== Error running command '['/usr/bin/git-bloom-generate', '-y',
> 'rosdebian', '--prefix', 'release/indigo', '--distros', 'trusty', 'indigo',
> '-i', '2']'
> Release failed, exiting.
>
> Ambigousu argument syntax... Eventually this fixed it :
> git-bloom-generate -y rosdebian --prefix release/indigo indigo --distros
> trusty -i 2
>
> We ll see what jenkins says in a few hours :-)
> --
> AlexV
>
>
> --
> AlexV
>
> 2015-06-11 3:22 GMT+09:00 William Woodall via ros-release <
> ros-release at lists.ros.org>:
>
>> I don't believe that it is possible since the build farm will always
>> generate a job for each supported ubuntu target on the given ROS
>> distribution. There is no way to indicate in the distribution.yaml file
>> that a particular target is unsupported.
>>
>> You could generate the appropriate tags and branches in bloom for only a
>> subset of ubuntu versions by adding the `--distros` option to the
>> `git-bloom-generate rosdebian` command in the "actions" section of the
>> `tracks.yaml` file of your release repository. However, that will not
>> prevent the farm from generating a job for those unreleased ubuntu versions.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Dirk Thomas via ros-release <
>> ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>
>>> The rosdistro contains the repository information:
>>> https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/blob/30ffc056ff662da7d59e7640bd0a6babbbc2ef1c/indigo/distribution.yaml#L1949-L1956
>>> The debbuild status page lists the package - but red means the debs
>>> haven't been built yet:
>>> http://www.ros.org/debbuild/indigo.html?q=flask_ext_catkin (click on
>>> the first red square of a specific platform to get to the Jenkins job)
>>> The Jenkins job is failing continuously because it can't find the
>>> necessary tags in the release repository:
>>> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/Isrc/job/ros-indigo-flask-ext-catkin_sourcedeb/33/console
>>>
>>> bloom could not resolve your Debian dependencies and stated: `Action
>>> skipped, continuing with release.`
>>> So it did not perform any Debian-related packaging.
>>> I have reverted the rosdistro entry for now since it would try to
>>> rebuild this package over and over again:
>>> https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/8650
>>>
>>> May be William can clarify if it is possible to release the package with
>>> bloom while the dependencies for one Ubuntu distro are missing.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> - Dirk
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Jack O'Quin via ros-release <
>>> ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Asmodehn Shade via ros-release <
>>>> ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> So I am learning how to release ros packages with bloom.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to release a package ( flask_ext_catkin ) that depends on
>>>>> python-alembic.
>>>>> Saucy doesn't have a package for python alembic, so I skipped it in
>>>>> the rosdep declaration.
>>>>>
>>>>> But this seems to break my release&builds for all debian based distros.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q : How can I get my release&builds to work for the debian based
>>>>> distros that have the package defined ( >trusty ) ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot !
>>>>>
>>>>> $ bloom-release --rosdistro indigo --track indigo flask-ext-catkin
>>>>> --edit
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> ==> git-bloom-generate -y rosdebian --prefix release/indigo indigo -i 1
>>>>> Generating source debs for the packages: ['flask_ext_catkin']
>>>>> Debian Incremental Version: 1
>>>>> Debian Distributions: ['saucy', 'trusty']
>>>>> Releasing for rosdistro: indigo
>>>>>
>>>>> Pre-verifying Debian dependency keys...
>>>>> Running 'rosdep update'...
>>>>> Could not resolve rosdep key 'python-alembic' for distro 'saucy':
>>>>> No definition of [python-alembic] for OS version [saucy]
>>>>> rosdep key : python-alembic
>>>>> OS name : ubuntu
>>>>> OS version : saucy
>>>>> Data: fedora:
>>>>> - python-alembic
>>>>> ubuntu:
>>>>> trusty:
>>>>> - alembic
>>>>> utopic:
>>>>> - python-alembic
>>>>> vivid:
>>>>> - python-alembic
>>>>> wily:
>>>>> - python-alembic
>>>>>
>>>>> Failed to resolve python-alembic on ubuntu:saucy with: Error running
>>>>> generator: Failed to resolve rosdep key 'python-alembic', aborting.
>>>>> python-alembic is depended on by these packages: ['flask_ext_catkin']
>>>>> <== Failed
>>>>> Some of the dependencies for packages in this repository could not be
>>>>> resolved by rosdep.
>>>>> You can try to address the issues which appear above and try again if
>>>>> you wish.
>>>>> Would you like to try again? [Y/n]? n
>>>>> User aborted after rosdep keys were not resolved.
>>>>> <== The following generator action reported that it is missing one or
>>>>> more
>>>>> rosdep keys, but that the key exists in other platforms:
>>>>> '['/usr/bin/git-bloom-generate', '-y', 'rosdebian', '--prefix',
>>>>> 'release/indigo', 'indigo', '-i', '1']'
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are absolutely sure that this key is unavailable for the
>>>>> platform in
>>>>> question, the generator can be skipped and you can proceed with the
>>>>> release.
>>>>> Skip generator action and continue with release [y/N]? y
>>>>>
>>>>> Action skipped, continuing with release.
>>>>>
>>>>> ==> git-bloom-generate -y rosrpm --prefix release/indigo indigo -i 1
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks to me like you *did* release flask_ext_catkin 0.1.0 to Indigo,
>>>> although the build farm hasn't done anything with it yet. Maybe there's a
>>>> problem there, or maybe it's just busy.
>>>> --
>>>> joq
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ros-release mailing list
>>>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-release mailing list
>>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William Woodall
>> ROS Development Team
>> william at osrfoundation.org
>> http://wjwwood.io/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-release mailing list
>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20150612/0000476a/attachment.html>
More information about the ros-release
mailing list