[ros-release] Preparations for final releases for Saucy, Utopic, and Vivid for Indigo and Jade April 1st.

Tully Foote tfoote at osrfoundation.org
Wed Apr 20 22:07:42 UTC 2016


The rebuild overnight has basically completed for all the targets except
armhf. However I see that there are a few failures related to a dependency
on the new beta catkin_tools on saucy.

http://build.ros.org/view/Ibin_uS64/job/Ibin_uS64__collada_urdf_jsk_patch__ubuntu_saucy_amd64__binary/8/console

While we're still waiting for armhf to finish rebuilding we can work to
resolve this. But otherwise we'll keep holding new releases except for new
kinetic packages, since new packages are leafs and will typically build
quickly and not significantly load the farm.

Tully

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As a quick update, we've rereleased ros_comm after triaging a few issues.
> The farms in a high intensity rebuild. We're going to hold all new releases
> to get indigo rebuilt. It's going to be a day or two
>
> Isaac, could you run the same patch release for Jade moveit? It looks like
> it's failing the same way. We'll work to triage that down once indigo has
> been rebuilt.
>
> Tully
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
> wrote:
>
>> @Isaac, Indeed, we look like we've resolved most of the regressions.
>> There are a few trailing builds on arm which are finishing up.
>>
>> @Everyone, please take some time to test this.
>>
>> @ros/rosdistro mergers please hold new indigo releases so we can have
>> some testing time with the clean state.
>>
>> @maintainers please let us know here if there's any issues that should
>> block the sync.
>>
>> I'll plan to sync early next week unless I hear otherwise.
>>
>> Tully
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Isaac Isao Saito-Yanagisawa via
>> ros-release <ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>
>>> > Looking at Indigo:
>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_default.html?q=REGRESSION
>>>
>>> For Indigo, it got much better now that moveit_* packages and
>>> dependent packages seem to have become available on shadow repo.
>>>
>>> -Isaac
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:10 PM, William Woodall
>>> <william at osrfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> > I'm waiting on someone to try a fix for building the broken packages
>>> with
>>> > `catkin_make`, which if it works I'll need to release rviz again.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Everyone,
>>> >>
>>> >> We've made good progress resolving the regressions. On Jade we only
>>> have
>>> >> one regression in moveit_ros_benchmark_gui :
>>> >> https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/issues/654
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_jade_default.html?q=REGRESSION
>>> >>
>>> >> Looking at Indigo:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_default.html?q=REGRESSION
>>> >>
>>> >> The same moveit regression is on indigo. As well as a few packages in
>>> the
>>> >> interactive_world repository with compile errors.
>>> >>
>>> >> Tully
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:42 PM, William Woodall via ros-release
>>> >> <ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm working on a fix for rviz on Saucy, and I opened an issue on
>>> >>> moveit_ros about the moveit_ros_benchmarks_gui (they will have to
>>> change
>>> >>> something because of a change in rviz).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Isaac Isao Saito-Yanagisawa via
>>> >>> ros-release <ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> moveit_ros (more specifically moveit_ros_benchmarks_gui) and some
>>> >>>> others that depend on it are also failing on both I and J.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Tully, do we not have to worry too much about these packages, maybe
>>> >>>> because looks like they were built successfully until a few days ago
>>> >>>> but suddenly started failing (they might be just hitting a temporary
>>> >>>> glitch)?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> ## I noticed this because some of the CI jobs in our repos that use
>>> >>>> shadow-fixed started failing due to these packages missing.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Isaac
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Mathieu Labbé
>>> >>>> <ros-release at lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>> >>>> > Hi,
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > I looked at the rtabmap error, but I am not sure what causes the
>>> >>>> > problem
>>> >>>> > (the error happens when creating the .deb after the
>>> build/install).
>>> >>>> > Locally,
>>> >>>> > I can build the .deb correctly. If someone has some ideas, I've
>>> made
>>> >>>> > an
>>> >>>> > issue here: https://github.com/introlab/rtabmap/issues/63
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > cheers,
>>> >>>> > Mathieu
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > 2016-03-22 20:47 GMT-04:00 Tully Foote via ros-release
>>> >>>> > <ros-release at lists.ros.org>:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Hi Everyone,
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> We're approaching the final releases of Indigo and Jade to be
>>> built
>>> >>>> >> on
>>> >>>> >> Saucy, Utopic, and Vivid.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Right now we have a few regressions.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Indigo Regressions:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_indigo_default.html?q=REGRESSION
>>> >>>> >> Jade Regressions:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> http://repositories.ros.org/status_page/ros_jade_default.html?q=REGRESSION
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> I see what appears to be 3 distinct groups. rtabmap, naoqi, and
>>> a set
>>> >>>> >> of
>>> >>>> >> jsk packages.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Maintainers of those packages please take a look at them. If they
>>> >>>> >> regress
>>> >>>> >> this cycle it will be permanent for Saucy, Utopic, and Vivid.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Please everyone consider testing the packages in shadow fixed in
>>> the
>>> >>>> >> next
>>> >>>> >> week and a half. We plan to do the sync at the end of next week
>>> on
>>> >>>> >> Friday
>>> >>>> >> April 1st.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> If there are any important releases pending please let us know.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Tully & William
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> >> ros-release mailing list
>>> >>>> >> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>> >>>> >> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > ros-release mailing list
>>> >>>> > ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>> >>>> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> ros-release mailing list
>>> >>>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>> >>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> William Woodall
>>> >>> ROS Development Team
>>> >>> william at osrfoundation.org
>>> >>> http://wjwwood.io/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> ros-release mailing list
>>> >>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>> >>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > William Woodall
>>> > ROS Development Team
>>> > william at osrfoundation.org
>>> > http://wjwwood.io/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-release mailing list
>>> ros-release at lists.ros.org
>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20160420/e2e5111e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ros-release mailing list