[ros-users] Nodelets
Radu Bogdan Rusu
rusu at willowgarage.com
Fri Aug 20 05:33:09 UTC 2010
Sounds great! Let us know if there's a particular feature you need that's missing atm. Also, if you build any cool
extended functionality that you would like to share/contribute back, you know where we live ;)
Cheers,
Radu.
On 08/19/2010 10:29 PM, Daniel Stonier wrote:
>
> Mixing processes and platforms is exactly what we've been pushing
> towards for a while. We had good motivation in that direction - our CTO
> would get antsy and more than a little frustrated when the engineers
> rolled out long schedules everytime he considered porting to a new
> robot. So I had a robot core developing with a custom libplugin manager
> (much like the nodelet manager) and a 'topic' style multithreaded
> sigslots library for communications.
>
> The nodelets is nice though, the roslaunch features are great and it
> collapses our redundancy in the data structures back to the single ros
> msg style format as well as removing the need for the sigslots. I can't
> think of anything we'd really need, except perhaps an easy way to
> sometimes extend/customise our own nodelet managers - which I don't
> think would be too hard after having a look at the nodelets code.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
>
> On 20 August 2010 12:02, Radu Bogdan Rusu <rusu at willowgarage.com
> <mailto:rusu at willowgarage.com>> wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> Nodelets are single process (usually multi-threaded), and you're
> right - the publish/subscribe intra-process
> optimization was implemented to get them to use the same ROS API
> mechanisms (in addition to other requests). The nice
> thing about the entire design is that you can easily split your
> nodelet modules into different processes and on
> different machines without changing anything in your code, simply by
> passing them to different nodelet managers.
>
> Cheers,
> Radu.
>
> On 08/19/2010 05:55 PM, Daniel Stonier wrote:
> >
> > Been playing around with nodelets and have a curiosity. I understand
> > that their design was driven by the need to pass objects by handles
> > (pointers) across messaging rather than full copies.
> >
> > Recently however, one of the willow garage guys (Josh maybe? I can't
> > remember) pointed me to try some tests a little while ago with node
> > handles. If carefully passing and publishing a boost pointer, then a
> > subscriber in the same process will simply receive that pointer and
> > bypass all the tcp/ip layers. Was this implemented recently as a
> result
> > of the work on nodelets? If not, are there any important differences
> > between this and nodelets communication mechanisms?
> >
> > Actually, I still like the nodelets. Being able to drop your
> libraries
> > containing nodelets onto the nodelet manager via roslaunch file is
> > awesome. You can put together an interrupt driven control system
> > designed entirely from libraries and xml without the need to even
> > program any binaries in most cases. Awesome.
> >
> > --
> > Phone : +82-10-5400-3296 (010-5400-3296)
> > Home: http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/
> > Yujin Robot: http://www.yujinrobot.com/
> > Embedded Control Libraries:
> http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/wiki/ecl
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-users mailing list
> > ros-users at code.ros.org <mailto:ros-users at code.ros.org>
> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
> --
> | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org <mailto:ros-users at code.ros.org>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> Phone : +82-10-5400-3296 (010-5400-3296)
> Home: http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/
> Yujin Robot: http://www.yujinrobot.com/
> Embedded Control Libraries: http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/wiki/ecl
--
| Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/
More information about the ros-users
mailing list