[ros-users] Can't fix small glitch on actionlib tutorial wiki page
Patrick Goebel
patrick at pirobot.org
Fri Feb 11 18:43:10 UTC 2011
Thanks Jeremy and Eitan! It was rather minor, but I thought I should
report it. Looks great now.
--patrick
On 2/11/2011 9:24 AM, Eitan Marder-Eppstein wrote:
> Ah yes, I was rushing through changing the tutorials and just blew off
> the code-ref sections. Things should be fixed across all the actionlib
> tutorials now... this wasn't the only one I screwed with.
>
> Sorry for any confusion this caused.
>
> Hope all is well,
>
> Eitan
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Jeremy Leibs <leibs at willowgarage.com
> <mailto:leibs at willowgarage.com>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Patrick Goebel
> <patrick at pirobot.org <mailto:patrick at pirobot.org>> wrote:
> > I noticed a small glitch on the actionlib tutorial page for
> writing a
> > Python server:
> >
> >
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/actionlib_tutorials/Tutorials/Writing%20a%20Simple%20Action%20Server%20using%20the%20Execute%20Callback%20%28Python%29
> >
> > The code breakdown for lines 40-45 is interrupted with the error:
> >
> > ERROR: unindent does not match any outer indentation level
> >
> > I saw that the CodeRef for that block was for lines 40-42 so I
> changed
> > it to 40-45 but that did not fix the error so at this point I
> need to
> > punt. (The Python indentation looks fine to my eye but maybe
> someone
> > else can catch it.)
>
> The issue is that line 40-42 were:
>
> break
> self._feedback.sequence.append(self._feedback.sequence[i] +
> self._feedback.sequence[i-1])
> # publish the feedback
>
> I'm guessing the python code parser being applied to the range of
> values still wants it to be a valid python block, which this isn't.
>
> Changing it to 41-43 fixed the problem. However, looking at all the
> other code blocks, many of them now have the off-by-one error.
>
> I looked through a change log, and it looks like Eitan added:
>
> self._as.start()
>
> To line 18 of the referenced code block, but didn't update any of the
> coderefs. Any CodeRef referencing a number greater than 18 will need
> to be incremented by 1. Also, I'm sure one of the sections referenced
> the interval including 18 and the doc probably needs to be changed to
> include calling self._as.start()
>
>
> >
> > --patrick
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-users mailing list
> > ros-users at code.ros.org <mailto:ros-users at code.ros.org>
> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org <mailto:ros-users at code.ros.org>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20110211/6307d64c/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the ros-users
mailing list