[ros-users] resolving open REP-0122 issues
Jonathan Bohren
jonathan.bohren at gmail.com
Tue Jul 24 20:52:30 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Jonathan Bohren
> <jonathan.bohren at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Dirk Thomas <dthomas at willowgarage.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Like the previous buildsystem catkin is aware of stacks and processes
> the
> >> stack.xml files.
> >>
> >> But in contrast to rosbuild catkin does not know anything about
> packages.
> >> It only uses CMake projects (which might correspond what has been
> packages
> >> before in a lot of cases - but does not have to).
> >
> >
> > So... in other words, at the moment, the notion of a "ros package" will
> > cease to exist in Groovy?
>
> I seriously doubt it.
>
> Dirk is saying the new catkin build system is unaware of the ROS
> package concept. But, ROS applications cannot be unaware of the
> package names they depend on.
>
It sounds like he's implying that the manifest.xml, and thus the ROS
package metadata will be optional, though.
-j
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20120724/40916018/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the ros-users
mailing list