[ros-users] Use cases for ROS on ARM based computers
Tully Foote
tfoote at willowgarage.com
Mon Jan 28 17:28:38 UTC 2013
Bob,
Thank you for providing more information about the reasons behind forming
the arm SIG. However please do not dismiss the points that others are
bringing up, and please do not speak for others. There have been many
valid points raised. And just because we have chosen a particular path does
not mean that it cannot be changed in the light of new discussion.
Tully
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Robert Teeter <bteeter2006 at yahoo.com>wrote:
> Gentlemen - The reason the the ros-sig-arm mailing list came to be because
> of the large group of people that wanted to have ROS on their ARM
> computers. I contacted several people at Willow Garage about information
> and direction about putting ROS on a Raspberry Pi system as it seem to be
> the best solution for what I was doing. I also found out that a lot of
> other people with the same and some different ARM systems were also
> interested. So a single point of contact mailing list was created to
> support that effort. You have asked why we just did not use the existing
> embedded mailing list for our questions. The major answer to that question
> is one that we do not have an embedded system for ROS. We are using an
> existing operating system that ROS runs on top of just like the supported
> platform of Ubuntu. So all we need to do is compile the ROS modules and
> place them into a distribution tree so that all the users of the release
> have somewhere to download from. In fact the Fuerte release was
> operational on the Raspberry Pi/Raspbian platform before the mailing list
> was started. The list was created on Jan 21 and at this point has over 70
> posts about the ros-sig-arm subject. We are also using the list to
> organize the building of the necessary repository trees with Willow Garage
> and to also add the items we need for OS ROS support in our own OS release
> trees. We are not out to ignore any other groups it just that what we are
> doing seem so different from what other groups were doing.
>
> Bob Teeter
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
--
Tully Foote
tfoote at willowgarage.com
(650) 475-2827
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20130128/884fcb67/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the ros-users
mailing list