[ros-users] ROS 2.0 Strategy review
tibokruse at googlemail.com
Mon Sep 28 12:35:42 UTC 2015
Vendor lock-in is one of the potential problems discussed here:
While ROS2 in theory avoids that problem by offering to switch between
vendors, in practice there may still be lots of effort to move from
one vendor to another, causing a "soft" vendor lock-in.
For more details this should be discussed in the NG Group linked above.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Valerio De Carolis via ros-users
<ros-users at lists.ros.org> wrote:
> On 27/09/15 02:02, BiggsGeoffrey via ros-users wrote:
>> Good wire protocols are hard, and leaving it up to the experts gives the
>> OSRF more developer time for the robotics things that go on top.
> Which sounds like building a skyscraper without taking care about its
> foundations. :)
> Imagine that people are looking for a system which is good both for
> commercial uses and research ones. The former are potentially afraid of
> betting on a vendor locked horse (to which one has to add all the concerns
> about IP and licensing) while the latter are looking for something that can
> work even outside the lab (one never knows if the next spin-off is around
> the corner).
> ----- We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to
> join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes.
> Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how
> to apply.
> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
> registered under charity number SC000278.
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at lists.ros.org
More information about the ros-users