[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] GSoC and the fate of OpenEmbedded

Daniel Hammer via Discourse.ros.org ros.discourse at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 17:23:20 UTC 2019



Thanks @vmayoral . I have already experimented with meta layers from jumpnowtek and meta-ros(to generate a beaglebone and raspberry image with ROS). I find it kind of weird that its still on indigo.
Also was there any work done on integrating rmw-microxrcedds from @BorjaOuterelo? Putting ROS on microcontrollers and sbcs should kinda be the point of OpenEmbedded.
Also why is the meta-ros2 GPL3 licensed? Isn't the point of ROS2 that companies can use it, modify the layer if they want to and ship their product close sourced?





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/gsoc-and-the-fate-of-openembedded/8149/3) or reply to this email to respond.




More information about the ros-users mailing list