Re: [ros-users] camera1394 and swissranger

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Patrick Beeson <beeson.p@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm fine with a name change.  I didn't want to conflict with the TUM
> version until this replaced it.  But it does indeed handle both devices
> with a header change and re-compile.

That won't work for binary distributions.

May be better to compile two separate nodes (sr3k and sr4k) from a
single source package with common CPP files using different compile
options.
--
joq