Re: [ros-users] problems with image_transport and remap

I'm not actually certain that those resolveNames are necessary. I added
them in early on, and thought that I had since taken them out.

> I believe it does. I probably messed this up for you a while back when
> I changed the node name logic in the driver. For compatibility, I
> publish camera/image_raw relative to the driver node name.
>
> By contrast, the wge100 driver publishes image_raw relative to a node
> handles set to:
>

>     camera_node_handle_(nh.resolveName("camera")),
>     camera_node_handle_alt_(nh.resolveName("camera_alternate")),

>
> This may make a difference in how remapping works. I am still trying
> to completely understand this stuff.