> Hello, I'd like to just shine a light on this last statement. I don't
> immediately understand why a shared memory transport can't compete
> with nodelets as I understand them. If nodelets are threads in a
> single process and use process memory to carry messages (which is
> essentially shared memory in that context), shouldn't nodelets and a
> shared memory transport be roughly equivalent in performance?
>
>
It depends entirely on what you mean by shared memory transport. If the
messages are allocated out of shared memory, and a pointer to them is simply
passed around, yes -- but that's not what Cedric's implementation did.
Serialization/deserialization is by far the largest time sync when dealing
with large messages, so unless you remove that overhead shared memory cannot
compete with nodelets.
http://ros-users.122217.n3.nabble.com/Shared-memory-transport-using-C-in-ROS-td414682.html#a414682
http://ros-users.122217.n3.nabble.com/Shared-memory-image-plugin-td782519.html#a782519
Josh
(text/plain)