> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kim Houck <
kim_houck@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this constitutes a bug/change request for camera1394,
>> since it may be limited to a very small subset of hardware and I'm not
>> sure if fixing this would cause problems for other camera hardware.
Would the dynamic reconfigure GUI be useful for this?
I believe we could easily add a "reopen" parameter that would attempt
to open the device again using the same parameters. That should not
hurt with other cameras.
--
joq
(text/plain)