[ros-users] pcl inconsistencies

Forside
Vedhæftede filer:
Indlæg som e-mail
+ (text/plain)
Slet denne besked
Besvar denne besked
Skribent: Jared Marshall Glover
Dato:  
Til: ros-users
Emne: [ros-users] pcl inconsistencies
There seems to be an inconsistency in PCL (at least in cturtle...I haven't
checked latest), in that some methods take angles in radians and some in
degrees. For example, SACSegmentation::setEpsAngle() accepts degrees for
SACMODEL_ORIENTED_PLANE, but radians for SACMODEL_ORIENTED_LINE. Perhaps there
should be a single convention throughout PCL to avoid confusion? It's already
caused some headaches around here =)

-Jared