Re: [ros-users] New urdf_tools Package

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] New urdf_tools Package
I renamed joint_state_publisher to oro_joint_state_publisher.
You are free to use joint_state_publisher name for your package.

Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz


2010/10/4 David Lu!! <>

> I've made a new version of the package as we discussed, but it looks
> like there's already a joint_state_publisher package in the orocos
> tools stack. Should I look for another name?
>
> -David!!
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Wim Meeussen <>
> wrote:
> >> Thank you for creating these tools! I am sure they will come in handy
> in
> >> lots of situations.
> >>
> >> Might I suggest renaming joint_controller to joint_state_publisher or
> >> fake_joint_state_publisher? Also, is easy_state_publisher is a special
> case
> >> of joint_controller?
> >
> > I really like the idea of the joint_state_publisher gui, it makes
> > visualizing and debugging a urdf file much easier. This would even
> > allow you to use rviz to debug a urdf file. This is something we
> > should absorb into the robot_model stack (we'll have to look into the
> > dependencies).
> >
> > For the easy_state_publisher, I'd think that if we give the new
> > joint_state_publisher the ability to run without a gui, it would be
> > possible to run it in combination with the current
> > robot_state_publisher offers the same (and much more!) functionality.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Wim
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Wim Meeussen
> > Willow Garage Inc.
> > <http://www.willowgarage.com)
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-users mailing list
> >
> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>