Re: [ros-users] ROS 1.3.0 Released

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] ROS 1.3.0 Released
Hi Daniel,

Diamondback is not due until February, so there are several months in
which rosjava can be migrated forward before a 'stable' release lands.
My understanding is that the maintainers will try to migrate rosjava
forward, but I do not wish to make promises on their behalf as they
are external contributors.

Judging from efforts with roscpp and roslisp, it should not be a
significant effort to perform this rewrite (<1 week of effort). Josh
cleaned up the Python libraries a bit when he did the roscpp
generators, so there's a good starting point (i.e. use genmsg_cpp.py
or genmsg_lisp.py, do *not* use genmsg_py.py as a starting point).
Given that there is a pre-existing message generator to compare
outputs against, it might be a task that you could take on.

regards,
Ken

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Hewlett <> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> I know that rosjava is experimental, but it's worked quite well for us and
> we have come to rely on it for a few things in our lab (since we have a good
> amount of pre-existing Java code). Am I understanding this correctly as
> saying that rosjava will not work at all in any release after 1.3.0, or is
> the situation only temporary? Also, what would be involved in converting
> rosjava to the new message generation paradigm? From reading the docs, it
> sounds like it's mostly a matter of porting some C++ code to Python, but not
> being familiar with the message generation process I don't have a good feel
> for how complex it would be.
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Ken Conley <> wrote:
>>
>> This is an unstable, "odd-cycle" release for doing development for ROS
>> 1.4. This release has many changes. Most notably, genmsg_cpp is no
>> longer supported, so rosjava and rosoct will not work with this
>> release. Also, many packages have been moved to the 'rx' and
>> 'documentation' stacks.
>>
>> For more information, please see the blog post:
>>
>> http://www.ros.org/news/2010/10/ros-130-released-unstable.html
>>
>>  -- your friendly neighborhood ROS core devs
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>>
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Hewlett
> Graduate Research Assistant
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Arizona
> http://www.cs.arizona.edu/~dhewlett/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>